The Contrarian Mormon

June 7, 2008

Rethinking Repentance

Filed under: Scripture — mahonri @ 2:14 am

Ray, a guest blogger at Mormon Matters, gives us this insight -

The Bible Dictionary defines “repentance” as: “a change of mind, i.e., a fresh view about God, about oneself, and about the world”. It goes to say, “Since we are born into conditions of mortality, repentance comes to mean a turning of the heart and will to God, and a renunciation of sin to which we are naturally inclined.” That is absolutely fascinating, since it describes repentance without mentioning any particular “process” at all. It leaves it simply as the turning of our heart and will to God. In that light, I submit the following:

Being poor in spirit is, essentially, recognizing one’s dependence on God and turning to Him in true humility — knowing that He provides not what we deserve (justice) but what He desires to give as a reward for our effort (mercy). “Perfection” is defined as being “complete, whole, fully developed”. (Matthew 5:48 – Footnote “b”) Therefore, being “imperfect” means being “incomplete, part, partially developed” — being, to some degree, an unfinished work — a “natural (wo)man”. This leads to an interesting meaning of repentance that is radically different than what was taught in ancient Israel (the Law of Moses perspective), with its emphasis on the Law (works).

The “classic” definition of repentance can be summarized in the following way: “feel sorry for your mistakes and stop making them”. It is, in a very real way, a process of surgery — attempting to cut out and discard the “bad” from within us, so that we will stop making mistakes. This can be incredibly destructive for three reasons: (more…)

Uzza killed for blind obedience

Filed under: Scripture — mahonri @ 2:08 am

Secco, on the Faith Promoting Rumor blog, writes …

… I think that we have been badly misinterpreting a story that is commonly used to support these concepts. The traditional Mormon interpretation of the story of Uzzah and the ark in 2 Samuel 6 and 1 Chr 13 is familiar to most of us: Uzzah reaches out to steady the ark during its transport and is killed for touching it. The modern-day interpretation for us has been that we should not correct Church leaders or Church policy, for despite our good intentions, the leaders of the Church are in charge and it is not our place to correct them. To quote from the D&C Student Manual for Religion 324/325, p188:

(more…)

B.H. Roberts saves the King Follett Discourse from obscurity

Filed under: History — mahonri @ 12:15 am
Tags:

J. Stapley, in his fascinating history of the King Follett Discourse, describes how some leaders of the LDS Church began to look upon that sermon with suspicion, and how B.H. Roberts single-handedly preserved it within the history of the Church, against the opposition of some of his fellow brethren:

The twentieth century brought different challenges. As the Church hierarchy struggled to divest itself of no-longer-favored pioneer theologies and systematize Mormon thought for the modern age, the KFD
again became a source of controversy.

(more…)

Blog at WordPress.com.